Posts Tagged ‘Movie Reviews’

Watchmen

March 6, 2009

Words cannot do Watchmen justice. Watchmen is an epic brutal (near) masterpiece. At a running time of 2hrs 40mins, I could have gone for more, and from the sound of things the DVD release will be about 3 hours. As the film opens on the event that sets the story into motion: The death of the Comedian, one word was going through my mind as it unfolded: Brutal. The fights were incredibly performed and incredibly filmed. The Comedian is physically huge and that required watching from a sort of distance, and it was incredible. Instead of using the “let’s shake the camera a lot to look intense” method, they perfected the fights and let us watch every move. A fantastic start.

One word that people were using to describe why this movie couldn’t work is “complicated”. But I followed the story very well, and I haven’t read the book yet (I’ll explain why in a minute). There was one exception to this however, when a major event was discovered by one of the characters. I had no idea what he was looking at and had to wait to figure out what he found, even thought they tried to show it initially. That was only one of a few drop points in the movie that took me out a bit.

I didn’t read the book beforehand because I wanted to be surprised while watching the movie. If the story was as good as they say it is, I wanted to see it on the screen first, then read the book. Doing it that way can only mean it will be better. I caught the midnight showing which was awesome. Even the 3am ride home. I will be picking up the book and reading it entirely, and then go see Watchmen in the IMAX. The theater I saw it in was decent, but the sound wasn’t that great. Some people say they don’t see the point in IMAX unless it was shot for the IMAX (i.e. certain Dark Knight scenes, and Transformers 2), but the sound in the IMAX is also way better than any theater.

The film was obvioulsy very dark in nature, and in that way I felt closer to it than any other superhero movie. Life is fucked up, and life in Watchmen was REALLY fucked up. So somehow that had a very emotional appeal. I loved Dr. Manhattan. He was forced into being the way he was through an accident, and over time lost his humanity, and started to not care about people at all. If you feel like you are really awesome and everyone around you sucks, to the point it depresses you, then Dr. Manhattan is the role model for you.

Rorschach was really awesome. You could say he was the “Batman” of the film because of the similarities in the voice, but this guy makes Batman look like the nice guy. Oh yeah, and Rorschach kills the bad guys. He’s not fuckin around. Rorschach has had it up to HERE with the scum of the city, not just the murderers and rapists, but people who…have sex and stuff (I REALLY have to read that book).

The opening credits, with “The Times They Are  A-Changin’” playing, was a major major major highlight for me. The way it was put together was just fantastic. I love segments like that, they are like another movie in a movie. I was MOST impressed with the incredibly accurate re-enactment of the assassination of JFK.

There was a couple parts in the last third of the film that totally pulled me out of the movie. The dialogue all of a sudden started to suck, and the story went very formulaic, but it quickly changed and I was right back in it. So it is very negligible at this point. Another thing that I questioned briefly was the music choices, but I understood why they did that and it didn’t distract me a whole lot. It was mostly popular music from the eras the were showing. There was some disco music for the 1970’s, and then some music from that Dustin Hoffman movie for the funeral. My favorite use of music was the rendition of Hallelujah during the fuck scene (the term “sex” is too light for what we saw), and then the organ tunes during the telling of the tragedy of Dr. Manhattan.

I am still amazed at how long this film was, and how much the length didn’t bother me. It could have been a five hour film, and as long as it was good, I would have watched it all. Their was a TON of awesome lines, most thanks to the graphic novel obviously, and the fight scenes were the best I’ve seen in a long time. Fucking brutal violence. It makes things very real when you go that far, and it pulls you in THAT much more. All the actors ranged from decent to brilliant, and you can’t ask for more from a cast of unknowns. The fact they are, for the most part, unknowns makes the movie that much better. They ARE those characters to you.

Zack Snyder is officially the coolest director in my world right now. I can’t wait to see what he does next.

I suggest you see this movie more than once. At least twice: The first time, stare at Dr. Manhattan’s penis every time it is on screen. That floppy blue penis will be calling your attention the whole time and if you try to avoid it, you will lose concentration on the slightly more important aspects of the film. By the time you see it again, you will have hopefully gotten rid of the urge to watch that thing flop around when he walks, and pay attention. Fuck it, go see it a third time JUST for all the nudity: Silk Spectre’s boobs, Night Owl’s ass cheeks, and the immortal floppy blue penis of Dr. Manhattan.

Get Off My Lawn

January 10, 2009

I went to see a movie tonight. The process I went through to decide between The Reader and Gran Torino went something like this: The Reader is about a woman, and Gran Torino is about a grumpy old man. I feel like a grumpy old man right now, Gran Torino it is.

I don’t know if Clint Eastwood set out to make a comedy, but he just made a heck of a dark (racist) comedy.

Walt Kowalski (Clint Eastwood) tells a joke:

A Jew, a Mexican, and a Gook walk in to a bar. The bartender says, “Get the fuck out!”

Walt then laughs his ass off.

If you are feeling grumpy, then, surprisingly, this movie about a grumpy guy will leave you happy and inspired. It does cover serious themes, most obvious: Life and Death. The life of Thao: Walt’s neighbor that becomes Walt’s apprentice of sorts, and the approaching death of Walt: A Korean War veteran approaching the end of his life.

The title, Gran Torino, comes from Walt’s prized Ford Gran Torino. As part of an initiation into a gang, Thao tries to steal it. He gets caught by Walt, and Thao’s family insists he repay a debt to Walt and work for him. Walt eventually takes him under his wing and helps him on the path to become a man. Thao had previously grown up without a role model or father figure.

This is a great film, and something that Clint Eastwood should be proud of in retirement.

I also recommend that nobody eat an abundance of Taco Bell prior to sitting for 90 minutes.

The Curious Case of Benjamin Button

December 26, 2008

I raced to the theater on Christmas night to see “The Curious Case of Benjamin Button”. I wasn’t entirely familiar with the story before seeing the trailers, but the second I saw them I had to see this film. The film follows Benjamin Button as he is born physically old, and then grows younger. What I loved so much about this film was that it didn’t matter how long it was. The running time was about 2 hrs and 40 mins. In films of that length, you tend to start feeling the time stretch at about 1 hr and 40 mins when you realize the film isn’t close to being over. But in the curious case of this film(I had to), the length didn’t bother me. Not at least until the last 10 minutes, but considering the entire film I can let that slide.

The supporting cast was also fantastic. Cate Blanchett is insanely hot in this film, and should always be a redhead. Tilda Swinton is also superb in absolutely everything she is in. The film was written by Eric Roth who also wrote Forrest Gump, and you can tell just a little bit every time a historical event intertwines with whats on screen.

It seemed that David Fincher, the director, had a little extra fun in this also. There was a character who would show up throughout the film and would recall the 7 different times he was struck by lightning, each story was accompanied by a 3 second classic film clip of that event, providing a laugh each time. It broke up the somberness in some places quite nicely. There was also a sequence that I found quite amazing, one in which Benjamin is narrating a chain of events that lead up to a certain event. It was just a small pearl to add to the treasure chest of this film.

I Couldn’t Stop Loving
There are a handful of films that can pull a feeling out of me throughout the duration. Benjamin Button held such a constant mood, constant tone, constant feeling throughout. While watching it I was filled with the strong…unexplainable feeling. It wasn’t energetic, but it definitely wasn’t tiring, just comforting. While watching Benjamin Button go through his life, learning, and accepting, and taking in life regardless of his condition, I was thinking of everyone that gives me these feelings. I was in a whole different place, falling in love with the people in the film. There are certain things that I think should qualify a good film, and one of them is the ability to take you places and then leave you better off than you were at the start of it. I love this film for that fact.

The Curious Case of Brad Pitt
Seeing Brad Pitt in a film like this makes me think back to when I was a little 3rd grader. There was a book fair that used to come to school, and they would have tons of shitty unauthorized biographies on the heartthrob actors of the time. Brad Pitt was the subject of many. Years later, I saw Fight Club and all of a sudden I was a Brad Pitt fan. Then Snatch came about and I changed my mind a little, thinking that he was just going to keep playing the muscly hot guy in every movie. The turning point that got me on the fan side of Brad Pitt, The Actor, was in “The Assassination of Jesse James by The Coward Robert Ford”. That is one of my favorite films, and one of my favorite performances by an actor, ever. Then he threw a curve ball with his great portrayal of an amazingly dumb fitness trainer in “Burn After Reading”. The dude can act, and “The Curious Case of Benjamin Button” just exemplifies that fact.

My “Zack and Miri Make A Porno” Review

November 2, 2008

poster
There are movies that I want to see. There are movies that I anticipate a week or two prior theatrical release. Then there are movies that I hear about from the conception of the idea and wait months, maybe a year, or maybe years until it is released. Such a movie is any Kevin Smith movie. The last one of his that I had the joy of torturing myself with the wait was Clerks 2. And now we have “Zack and Miri Make A Porno”. Not only was I anticipating it because it was a Kevin Smith movie, or it had “porno” in the title, it was also because of Seth Rogen. I have been a Seth Rogen fan from day one of him being on screen with the Apatow bunch. So yeah, “Zack and Miri Make A Porno” was all kinds of goodness.

I’ll get the obvious stuff out of the way. The dialogue penned by Smith is untouchable, hilarious, and downright filthy. Seth Rogen’s presence only adds completely to it. Where Smith’s films shine is all the in between dialogue. If the two characters are on screen discussing a plot point that keeps the story moving, then you are laughing your ass off at all the other stuff they are saying. What is also so amazing is that the story is JUST as great as the in between. Smith doesn’t let his story take the back seat to his jokes, the story is in the front seat going right along with them (random metaphor). Now you may look at the title and say, “Well really, how far can you go with the story that is clearly spelled out in the title”. And I say, “NAY! You ignorant pig!”. If the story was truly spelled out in the title it would be “Zack and Miri Make a Porno, and, In The Process, Realize That It Might Be More Than Just Sex”. The actual title is a lot cooler though.

I was thrilled at the fact that this was a movie outside of the Askewniverse (i.e. Jay and Silent Bob-iverse). I walked out of the film calling it a “new breed” of Kevin Smith films. Then my friend asked me in reply, “Oh it’s not a feel good film like the rest of his others?”. To which I said, “Yes, it is.” So I take it back, it is NOT a new breed. But it is just joining the rest of the breed (another random metaphor?).

The supporting cast he picked up for this was amazing. No doubt was there Jason Mewes, for once NOT playing a stoner with long hair, but playing a horny man with a long penis. Justin Long was hilarious as a male porn star/porn director/porn distributor. And the guy who played his boyfriend was just super, man. Craig Robinson of “The Office” fame was also hilarious as the “producer” of the porno. And there is not enough to say about Elizabeth Banks. I just saw her in “W.”, and now this. She is very talented, very funny, and very hot.

This film is very funny, but even I can admit it is not Smith’s funniest. But that’s like saying a 7-inch dick isn’t quite as good as a 7 1/2 inch dick (here’s the dick metaphors). The story is clearly funny, and adds that Kevin Smith sweetness. This movie holds one of my favorite sex scenes ever, and it doesn’t even involve nudity. Smith just translated everything we were supposed to feel, and what the characters feel, all so well.

If there is ANY downside, it is that this isn’t Smith’s funniest movie. But that’s hardly noticeable. This is a great achievement and great addition to the Kevin Smith Library. I give “Zack and Miri Make A Porno” an 7 out of 10.

My “Max Payne” Review

October 19, 2008

“All video game movies suck.” That is a common phrase around the interweb, and I mostly agree with it (although I do enjoy the Resident Evil series quite a bit). When plans of a Max Payne movie rolled around and they announced Wahlberg for the role I felt a smidge of optimism. When I saw Max Payne I felt a smidge of entertainment. Just a smidge.

What makes me angry about the “All video game movies suck” school of thought is that they don’t HAVE to suck. It is just time and time again terrible film-makers have kept this theme going. Max Payne doesn’t change that at all. It just doesn’t deliver on all levels. There are a few amazing visuals in this movie, but they are too far and in between.

The plot starts with Max Payne some years after his family’s murder. He is out for revenge. Connections are slowly but surely made between his family’s death and the death of a girl that he refused to fuck, and a drug on the streets.

This film had amazing visuals of hallucinations when people were on the drug. I think they could have used the drug and hallucinations a lot more and made the film more interesting. Instead we get Wahlberg, with his bad-ass face on, walking around intimidating people. They also used the slow-motion effect that was used in the game a couple times, but it just came off as distracting instead of contributing to the actual story.

Mark Wahlberg didn’t really do anything special with this character, but at the same time the writers didn’t give him a chance to flesh it out. I read an interview and he talked so highly about the film, but perhaps when he talks about it in retrospect he will think differently. I thought it was pretty cool to see Mila Kunis. I don’t think she has had a role like this before. She didn’t do a WHOLE lot but it was something different so I give her some credit.

Nothing about this film, except for a couple cool visuals that collectively equal about a minute, was memorable.

Despite all assumptions that video game movies suck, I gave this film a chance. It let me down. I was bored within 30 minutes of watching. Please do yourself a favor and don’t see this movie.

I give Max Payne a 3 out of 10.

Say “hi” to your mother for me okay?

My “W.” Review

October 19, 2008

As I drove to the theater to see “W.” I decided it was about damn time I come up with a solid opinion of the real George W. Bush. When I think of George W. Bush I think of words such as idiot, dumb, misunderestimated, and lots of other demeaning words. But those words are not mine. Those are words from the mouths of many pissed off Americans. My question has always been:

Who is this man, and how did he become the most hated president of my time?

Perhaps this film answered it, or it just opened up the answer that I already had in me.

Oliver Stone wanted me to feel bad for W. I did feel bad up to a certain point in his life, but when W. changed himself to prove something to his father I stopped believing in him. Oliver Stone didn’t make this film to make fun of W., but he made it to show us that he was no different than any of us at one point in our lives. Stone also showed us that there is a point in our lives where we can do things differently.

The events in W.’s life that were shown helped greatly in shaping my opinion. They will also add to those already established opinions if people are open to it. This film does something fantastic in taking the most hated man and turning him into a person, and it does so in a clean and honorable fashion. It has it’s laughs, but not always at the expense of our current president. And it has it’s slow parts that had me wondering at what point the film would start moving again.

Josh Brolin’s performance also lends a huge hand in the task of humanizing W. I was watching the man called W, and not Josh Brolin as W, which is all I can ask for from an actor. The same goes for the rest of the major cast. I was blown away by Thandie Newton as Condoleeza Rice. And I mean that in a bad way, that was more a bad impression than acting. I also favored the performance of Jeffrey Wright as Colin Powell. I had never actually heard Powell talk a lot, but Wright convinced me that Powell probably talks just like that. From the moment I heard Elizabeth Banks was going to be playing Laura Bush I was very surprised. And while watching her performance, I was surprised throughout that she was actually doing this film (I will love her so much more when I see her in “Porno”).

I congratulate Oliver Stone on his accomplishment. W. is one of the most unforgettable films I have seen.

Back to my question:

Who is this man, and how did he become the most hated president of my time?

This man’s path to becoming president was not the best path. He spent a life trying to prove himself worthy of the Bush name, something that he shouldn’t have had to do. He had dreams in his early life of being an athlete and that carried on throughout his life. But his father, constantly dragging him down, didn’t allow that dream to flourish. This situation is very classic to me:

A person has a dream, but people try to hold them back. The great people see through the oppressors and succeed. Some people are so brought down that they may not succeed in obtaining their dreams, but they can still carry inspiration and hope on to others. Then you have your “W.”’s, and they become a lesser version of what they could have been, or something else they never should have been. President.

I give “W.” a 7 out of 10.

My “Burn After Reading” Review

September 12, 2008

If you liked No Country For Old Men, well, it doesn’t matter because “Burn After Reading” is a DIFFERENT film altogether.

“What the fuck!?” is what the tagline should be for this movie. John Malkovich’s character uses it extensively, and the audiences across the nation have probably said it too while watching this.

The story starts off simple enough: a CIA analyst gets demoted but doesn’t take it too well, and quits instead. He decides to start writing some memoirs that include details about his secret work with the CIA. His wife, in an attempt to get his financial records on a disc, accidentally copies his memoirs along with them. Her lawyer’s secretary drops her copy in Hardbody’s Gym and it lands in the hands of the awesomely, flaky, bleached-blonde-haired Chad Feldheimer played every little bit by Brad Pitt. He believes he has his hands on some classified intelligence “shit”. He believes he can get money for it by blackmailing the owner, Osbourne Cox played by Malkovich, and Chad’s co-worker wants in on the action so she can pay for her cosmetic surgery(s).

A tangled fucking web starts to get weaved including unfaithful wives and husbands, and one confused as hell CIA superior played perfectly by J.K. Simmons (most would know him as J. Jonah Jameson, or Juno’s daddy).

I was super-pumped to go see this movie. One reason being the Coens, and the other being Brad Pitt. I say Brad Pitt because the dude is fucking amazing in everything I’ve seen him in since Fight Club, not because I’m gay (I’d fuck him).

Brad Pitt definitely lived up to my expectations and beyond, as always with him. We are so used to seeing him being the cool guy, but then you get him as this who works in a gym and just does NOT have a clue and it is brilliant.

John Malkovich was pure madness and pushed the anger and drinking problems to just the right level, not too over the top.

Frances McDormand’s character was just as dumb as Pitt’s, and they were an amazing team. Watching her character’s actions was a treat. The whole time you are thinking to yourself, “Is she really doing/saying that?”

Tilda Swinton played an awesome bitch. Yeah, she was a bitch and it was perfect.

Let’s not forget Mr. George Clooney. I don’t think I’ve ever seen him in a role like this. With the combination of Brad Pitt AND George Clooney playing someone other than their cool guy characters, it was amazing. It was refreshing to not recognize Clooney as Clooney, and instead as this guy with some serious issues.

What amazes me most about this movie is the writing. This is one of the best stories, writing-wise, that I’ve ever seen. This is some hardcore and reverse-engineered “shit”. I say reverse-engineered because there’s no way the Coens’ could write this in a linear fashion. They had to have started at the end and wrote this backwards to follow it themselves. I give them HUGE credit for this.

Best comedy/thriller/spy-crime/drama/noir/”What the fuck!?” film of the year.

Burn After Reading

8 out of 10

My “Pineapple Express” Review

August 9, 2008

4 out of 5

The first trailer for Pineapple Express had left me flabbergasted. I didn’t know what to think. It was two guys, who seemed a lot like the stoner kids that I steered away from in high school, talking about and smoking some pot. I was thinking that either it wasn’t funny in the least, or that it was just blowing(ha ha) right over my head in stoner fashion that I don’t understand. Thank GOD this movie turned out to be SOOO much better than that trailer made me initially think.

The main thing I keep hearing is that this is a comedy for stoners, and only stoners will enjoy it the most. I have to say that, for someone who has never been into smoking pot, I enjoyed this movie just as much as anybody who has smoked themselves dumb. Stoner comedy has become it’s own comedy form thanks to the likes of Cheech and Chong and…any other comedian who smokes pot. Either Seth Rogan and Evan Goldberg are geniuses or I like stoner comedy. I like to think the former is true.

The film starts out by giving us Seth Rogan’s character, Dale. Dale is a guy who serves court papers to people. He dresses up in disguises because, unless the person identifies themselves, he can’t give them the papers. A great intro that hardly means anything to the rest of the movie, which is just fine.

Then we meet James Franco’s character, Saul. By far one of my favorite comedic characters ever. The guy just NAILS the unkempt stoner look and comes off very likable in the process. I couldn’t believe that this was the same guy that played Harry Osborn in Spider-Man. The thing I (and probably everyone else) notice about some comedy actors, including Rogan, is that they basically play the same guy in every comedy they do. But seeing the diversity of Franco in Spider-Man, and then Pineapple Express, makes me think this guy is a really good actor. I hope to see more roles from him in major movies.

The action in this movie just blew me away, in more ways than one. First, it was hilarious a lot of the time. Second, it was GOOD action and it was done well. It reminded me so much of Hot Fuzz in the way that both movies were made by people who grew up on action films. They both took their favorite parts of different action movies and rolled them into one. They manage to pay tribute to AND mock a little bit the action, while keeping it FUNNY. Pineapple Express also succeeded where another summer 2008 movie, Get Smart, failed. Get Smart was supposed to be a comedy, so that’s what I was expecting. But what I got was a few snickers and some okay action. Get Smart I think tried too hard on the action, and didn’t try hard enough on the funny. Pineapple Express kept an amazing balance between the two, so much so that they just blend together into the greatest action-comedy I can think of.

The story is brilliant. As seen on the preview: Rogan’s character, Dale, witnesses a murder and then not-so-silently gets away from the scene. But not before being noticed by the murderers. They follow the easy trail by finding the roach (stoner term for a disposed joint…wow I’m so cool and hip) that Dale ditched out the window. They murderer recognizes the weed as being Pineapple Express, and the plot’s genius unfolds.

You absolutely MUST see this film. This movie is incredibly funny and awesome (note to self- create new adjectives to describe greatness of movies). bye bye.

Become a Fan of my Ryan For The Future facebook page.

My “The Dark Knight” Review: Round Two.

July 23, 2008

I finally got to see the Dark Knight for the second time. I am aware it has only been 5 days since the midnight showing, but it could NOT wait. So on take two of watching the movie I decided to pay attention to details that have been brought to my attention that I did not notice before. I also reevaluted the problems I had with the film the first time around. If you haven’t seen the film and for SOME UNHOLY REASON have not heard how freakin’ amazing it is, and you somehow need to be convinced before seeing it. Then read my first review, because I will be getting very nit-picky in this article.

SPOILER ALERT! DO NOT READ ANY FURTHER UNLESS YOU HAVE SEEN THE DARK KNIGHT!

This is pretty much my analysis of certain parts of the film, and other thoughts as I watched it for the second time:

Opening Scene: The Bank Heist

I love the opening of The Dark Knight. No opening credits, a bat sign coming out of blue flames and BOOM we are in the film. The opening bank heist scene is the best opening that I could have hoped for. It is the perfectly twisted plan to expect from The Joker. He hires everyone and tells them each to kill the other guy so that the shares are bigger, but nobody knows that the other guy was also told to kill a guy. Out of confusion and a perfectly crafted plan, The Joker is revealed to actually be involved in the heist and is the last man standing.

The Parking Garage Scene

This scene is where the problems start, and overall it is a weak scene. The Scarecrow and some mobsters are meeting over a problem with the Scarecrow’s drugs. A copycat Batman steps in and starts shooting people. Not a bad start to the scene. In comes the awesome tank-of-a-Batmobile under remote control. Again, pretty awesome start. So where’s the Bat? He appears in the garage out of the darkness, as usual, and BENDS A GUN BARREL WITH ONE HAND!? I’m no scientist or physicist or geinocologist but I think we can all agree that it takes more than human strength to bend a barrel of a gun in the way it happened in this film. Not only that, but, if Batman actually had super strength, that thug would not be able to hold that gun as Batman bent the barrel. It would just get lifted out of his hands. How did the makers of this film let that one go? I understand expirimenting, but there had to be a point where someone was like, “Wait a minute, that’s fuckin cheesy.”

I did really enjoy the next part when Batman jumped on the side of the van and tried to cut his way in. He failed badly and got slammed into one of the garage’s support pillars, and just to be attacked by a couple of dogs. There was no better or funnier way than to show how he is still not so perfect and very human. But he kicks those pooches asses and jumps off the ledge to land on top of the van that the Scarecrow is escaping in. So then Batman ties him and the copycat Batman up and drives off. THAT’S IT?!

Here’s what I was hoping for: In the movie Face/Off there is a scene in the start of the movie that looks like the ending action sequence in most action films. It just takes the action, emotion, and intensity to the max right off the bat(ha ha). So I was hoping that if they were going to finish off the Scarecrow in the beginning of this movie, make it huge. Have a crazy fight with the Scarecrows poison shit spraying everywhere and give Batman a HUGE run for his money from the start. The dog bites and the slam into the pillar were a good touch on that front, but imagine him high on that Scarecrow angeldust with two dogs on his ass.

Overall, it was a weak ending for Scarecrow and a weak introduction for Batman.

Maggie Gyllenhaal as Rachel Dawes

Don’t worry, it gets positive here.

The first time seeing this film I totally forgot to watch Maggie Gyllenhaal’s performance, and the difference between her and Holmes. I made sure to pay attention this time, and she blew me away. The chemistry she had with Harvey Dent and Bruce Wayne was fantastic and worked so well. She brought a whole new dimension to the character that was not brought out at all from Katie Holmes’s performance. I especially noticed how awesome she was during the interrogation scene with Lau and her last scene in the warehouse rigged with explosives. Great casting choice.

Heath Ledger as The Joker

I won’t get into detail here because the performance speaks for itself. Some of the best parts in the film and the best parts with the Joker are when he is talking. Ledger as The Joker is one of the best performances I have ever seen(TAKE NOTE: I only said the best performance, I PERSONALLY, have seen.) Definitely one of my favorite performances ever. Up there with Daniel Day-Lewis as Daniel Plainview in There Will Be Blood. The real tragedy is that Heath Ledger is not around to receive the praise in person.

Christian Bale as Bruce Wayne/Batman

The first time watching all my attention was on the Joker, but this time I made sure to pay closer attention to Bale and his, no doubt, perfect performance. The performance of Bale as Bruce Wayne is great, because it is actually Christian Bale acting as Bruce Wayne acting as an irresponsible playboy enjoying daddy’s trust fund. The true character of Bruce Wayne is actually Batman. Just like Superman’s costume is Clark Kent, Batman’s costume is “Bruce Wayne The Playboy”.

Aaron Eckhart as Harvey Dent/Two-Face

There is no other word that comes to mind other than perfect. Watching him from the start of the film, being fresh into the DA position, through his path to madness, becoming (a short-lived) Two-Face, was nothing short of phenomenal and moving. That brings me to my next point:

The Death of Two-Face

As awesome as Eckhart was as Two-Face, I would have liked to see less of him in this film and more of him in another Batman film. If they had left him where he was in that hospital bed, incredibly pissed off and vengeful after having talked to the Joker, then that would have freed up a lot of time. That extra time could have been used to compliment my idea of a bigger demise to the Scarecrow and bigger entrance for Batman in the beginning of the movie. Don’t get me wrong, everytime Two-Face was on screen was still amazing, but he was so underused. The whole scene with Two-Face and Gordon’s family should not have happened. Even after all that happened to Harvey Dent, I think it would have taken a lot more time to drive him crazy enough to want to kill a child. Enough time would be, say, the first two acts of a third Batman movie?

Film Conclusion

After Two-Face is dead on the ground, Batman and Commissioner Gordon exchange some grand speeches. My understanding is that Batman and Gordon have realized that Gotham needs a hero, obviously, but Batman can not be the hero they need…yet. Batman says he will take the blame for the men that Two-Face killed. He has to break his only rule of not killing people, and that makes him The Dark Knight. The savior of Gotham City who has to KILL the bad guys because it’s the only way. Now sticking to that philosophy. All they had to do was have Batman kill the joker. That was a great scene when the Joker and Batman fought it out for the last time. One of my favorite parts in the whole film was Joker falling off of the building. It was just very intense for the short amount of time it happens. And then him talking while hanging upside down was equally intense and a great performance by Ledger. The details of what should have happened next could be up to the film-makers, but ultimately there should have been some last bit of scuffling between the two and then the Joker falls and does NOT get saved. And my opinion on having the Joker die in the end is in NO WAY influenced by the death of Heath Ledger. I think it was in the film maker’s intention to leave the ending with the Joker the way it was before the death of Ledger.

Side Note: I absolutely loved that they saved showing the title, “The Dark Knight”, until the very end of the movie when he truly becomes The Dark Knight.

The Film Kicks Ass

There is no doubt that this is the craziest, darkest, and most awesome comic book movie to hit the screens since Batman Begins. Most of this article seems like a downer on the film, but I am mearly PURPOSELY pointing out the bad parts. I couldn’t write an article on ALL the great parts of this movie because it would be way to long, not to say this one isn’t.

As much as I would like to have seen more Joker in a third movie, I would have been plenty happy with the Joker meeting his death at the hands of THE DARK KNIGHT!

Become a Fan of my Ryan For The Future facebook page.

My “The Dark Knight” Review

July 20, 2008


4.5 out of 5

The first Christopher Nolan Batman reboot, “Batman Begins”, caught me way off gaurd. That came out before I started paying attention to the movie world through the internet. What started my journey into the online movie world was one website called The Movie Blog. I came across it by chance one day and have been a loyal reader and participator since. Then, on November 17, 2006 came the announcement of The Dark Knight and it’s release date of July 18, 2008. The longest fucking wait of my life.

The first thing I have to say about this movie is that it is ALL ABOUT THE JOKER. The late Heath Ledger’s Joker makes The Dark Knight the fantastic movie it is. I have no idea how the hell he pulled off such a crazy character. Not only that, while the Joker is doing crazy, insane, and twisted shit, you are laughing at him. Every time the Joker was on screen I was getting goosebumps and was excited and could not believe my eyes. In everything that I have seen Heath Ledger in, I would never have guessed he could do something like this. The face I could recognize, but the voice and the way he talked and some of the expressions were things that were too good to be true. The tragedy here is that we Heath Ledger won’t get to receive the praise in person, and we will never see more Joker or any other roles from Ledger.

The story-line is a well written one. They had a lot of characters to deal with in this one and handled mostly all of them very well. Batman/Bruce Wayne, The Joker, Harvey Dent, Comissioner Gordon, and even Alfred all got their equal time on screen. Not too much of anyone. I watched the Siskel and Ebert review for Tim Burton’s first Batman movie and one thing they said was that the Joker routine was so overexposed in the ‘89 film. In “The Dark Knight” we get the Joker in perfect doses. The film is also packed with flawless action and fight sequences and I hope to catch this in IMAX theaters to check them out on that screen. The best scene of all has to be the one we see a bit of in the previews when the Joker is in the interrogation room with Batman. Heath Ledger and Christian Bale get to show off their acting chops in this gritty and riveting scene between Joker and Batman.

The character of Harvey Dent, and eventually Two-Face, is played to perfection by Aaron Eckhart. He was an amazing casting choice that I would never have thought of. The last film I saw him in was “Thank You For Smoking”, which was quite a lighter role than this one, and just like with Ledger I never expected such a dark and moving performance out of a comic book character.

Let’s not forget Christian Bale. His performance is so freaking good and consistent with the last film that nobody will talk about it, because this is the Joker’s film and Christian Bale is doing the great job he is supposed to as Batman.

John Campea over at The Movie Blog posted a great article that makes a great point about the hyper praise of The Dark Knight being compared to The Godfather and other such films:

The Short Version

* The Dark Knight is a great movie
* It’s not even close to being the “darkest” or “Grittiest” or “violent” or “best crime drama” movie ever
* It’s ok to love a movie without the need to make up fake praises and to admit its shortcomings

Read the full article here.

The last bit of the movie did not sit well with me and I did not expect it to end when it did. I can’t really elaborate on it without it being a spoiler so I will leave that for a follow up so EVERYONE can see it first. But do not let that ruin your hopes for this film (assuming you live under a rock and haven’t already seen it). This is a fantastic movie and will go down as one of the BEST COMIC BOOK MOVIES ever. Heath Ledger’s Joker, along with Christian Bale’s Batman, will go down as some of the BEST COMIC BOOK MOVIE CHARACTER PERFORMANCES ever. And Christopher Nolan will go down as THE SAVIOR OF THE BATMAN FILMS.

Get in your fucking Batmobile and go see this.