Posts Tagged ‘Movies’

Watchmen

March 6, 2009

Words cannot do Watchmen justice. Watchmen is an epic brutal (near) masterpiece. At a running time of 2hrs 40mins, I could have gone for more, and from the sound of things the DVD release will be about 3 hours. As the film opens on the event that sets the story into motion: The death of the Comedian, one word was going through my mind as it unfolded: Brutal. The fights were incredibly performed and incredibly filmed. The Comedian is physically huge and that required watching from a sort of distance, and it was incredible. Instead of using the “let’s shake the camera a lot to look intense” method, they perfected the fights and let us watch every move. A fantastic start.

One word that people were using to describe why this movie couldn’t work is “complicated”. But I followed the story very well, and I haven’t read the book yet (I’ll explain why in a minute). There was one exception to this however, when a major event was discovered by one of the characters. I had no idea what he was looking at and had to wait to figure out what he found, even thought they tried to show it initially. That was only one of a few drop points in the movie that took me out a bit.

I didn’t read the book beforehand because I wanted to be surprised while watching the movie. If the story was as good as they say it is, I wanted to see it on the screen first, then read the book. Doing it that way can only mean it will be better. I caught the midnight showing which was awesome. Even the 3am ride home. I will be picking up the book and reading it entirely, and then go see Watchmen in the IMAX. The theater I saw it in was decent, but the sound wasn’t that great. Some people say they don’t see the point in IMAX unless it was shot for the IMAX (i.e. certain Dark Knight scenes, and Transformers 2), but the sound in the IMAX is also way better than any theater.

The film was obvioulsy very dark in nature, and in that way I felt closer to it than any other superhero movie. Life is fucked up, and life in Watchmen was REALLY fucked up. So somehow that had a very emotional appeal. I loved Dr. Manhattan. He was forced into being the way he was through an accident, and over time lost his humanity, and started to not care about people at all. If you feel like you are really awesome and everyone around you sucks, to the point it depresses you, then Dr. Manhattan is the role model for you.

Rorschach was really awesome. You could say he was the “Batman” of the film because of the similarities in the voice, but this guy makes Batman look like the nice guy. Oh yeah, and Rorschach kills the bad guys. He’s not fuckin around. Rorschach has had it up to HERE with the scum of the city, not just the murderers and rapists, but people who…have sex and stuff (I REALLY have to read that book).

The opening credits, with “The Times They AreĀ  A-Changin’” playing, was a major major major highlight for me. The way it was put together was just fantastic. I love segments like that, they are like another movie in a movie. I was MOST impressed with the incredibly accurate re-enactment of the assassination of JFK.

There was a couple parts in the last third of the film that totally pulled me out of the movie. The dialogue all of a sudden started to suck, and the story went very formulaic, but it quickly changed and I was right back in it. So it is very negligible at this point. Another thing that I questioned briefly was the music choices, but I understood why they did that and it didn’t distract me a whole lot. It was mostly popular music from the eras the were showing. There was some disco music for the 1970’s, and then some music from that Dustin Hoffman movie for the funeral. My favorite use of music was the rendition of Hallelujah during the fuck scene (the term “sex” is too light for what we saw), and then the organ tunes during the telling of the tragedy of Dr. Manhattan.

I am still amazed at how long this film was, and how much the length didn’t bother me. It could have been a five hour film, and as long as it was good, I would have watched it all. Their was a TON of awesome lines, most thanks to the graphic novel obviously, and the fight scenes were the best I’ve seen in a long time. Fucking brutal violence. It makes things very real when you go that far, and it pulls you in THAT much more. All the actors ranged from decent to brilliant, and you can’t ask for more from a cast of unknowns. The fact they are, for the most part, unknowns makes the movie that much better. They ARE those characters to you.

Zack Snyder is officially the coolest director in my world right now. I can’t wait to see what he does next.

I suggest you see this movie more than once. At least twice: The first time, stare at Dr. Manhattan’s penis every time it is on screen. That floppy blue penis will be calling your attention the whole time and if you try to avoid it, you will lose concentration on the slightly more important aspects of the film. By the time you see it again, you will have hopefully gotten rid of the urge to watch that thing flop around when he walks, and pay attention. Fuck it, go see it a third time JUST for all the nudity: Silk Spectre’s boobs, Night Owl’s ass cheeks, and the immortal floppy blue penis of Dr. Manhattan.

My “Zack and Miri Make A Porno” Review

November 2, 2008

poster
There are movies that I want to see. There are movies that I anticipate a week or two prior theatrical release. Then there are movies that I hear about from the conception of the idea and wait months, maybe a year, or maybe years until it is released. Such a movie is any Kevin Smith movie. The last one of his that I had the joy of torturing myself with the wait was Clerks 2. And now we have “Zack and Miri Make A Porno”. Not only was I anticipating it because it was a Kevin Smith movie, or it had “porno” in the title, it was also because of Seth Rogen. I have been a Seth Rogen fan from day one of him being on screen with the Apatow bunch. So yeah, “Zack and Miri Make A Porno” was all kinds of goodness.

I’ll get the obvious stuff out of the way. The dialogue penned by Smith is untouchable, hilarious, and downright filthy. Seth Rogen’s presence only adds completely to it. Where Smith’s films shine is all the in between dialogue. If the two characters are on screen discussing a plot point that keeps the story moving, then you are laughing your ass off at all the other stuff they are saying. What is also so amazing is that the story is JUST as great as the in between. Smith doesn’t let his story take the back seat to his jokes, the story is in the front seat going right along with them (random metaphor). Now you may look at the title and say, “Well really, how far can you go with the story that is clearly spelled out in the title”. And I say, “NAY! You ignorant pig!”. If the story was truly spelled out in the title it would be “Zack and Miri Make a Porno, and, In The Process, Realize That It Might Be More Than Just Sex”. The actual title is a lot cooler though.

I was thrilled at the fact that this was a movie outside of the Askewniverse (i.e. Jay and Silent Bob-iverse). I walked out of the film calling it a “new breed” of Kevin Smith films. Then my friend asked me in reply, “Oh it’s not a feel good film like the rest of his others?”. To which I said, “Yes, it is.” So I take it back, it is NOT a new breed. But it is just joining the rest of the breed (another random metaphor?).

The supporting cast he picked up for this was amazing. No doubt was there Jason Mewes, for once NOT playing a stoner with long hair, but playing a horny man with a long penis. Justin Long was hilarious as a male porn star/porn director/porn distributor. And the guy who played his boyfriend was just super, man. Craig Robinson of “The Office” fame was also hilarious as the “producer” of the porno. And there is not enough to say about Elizabeth Banks. I just saw her in “W.”, and now this. She is very talented, very funny, and very hot.

This film is very funny, but even I can admit it is not Smith’s funniest. But that’s like saying a 7-inch dick isn’t quite as good as a 7 1/2 inch dick (here’s the dick metaphors). The story is clearly funny, and adds that Kevin Smith sweetness. This movie holds one of my favorite sex scenes ever, and it doesn’t even involve nudity. Smith just translated everything we were supposed to feel, and what the characters feel, all so well.

If there is ANY downside, it is that this isn’t Smith’s funniest movie. But that’s hardly noticeable. This is a great achievement and great addition to the Kevin Smith Library. I give “Zack and Miri Make A Porno” an 7 out of 10.

My “Max Payne” Review

October 19, 2008

“All video game movies suck.” That is a common phrase around the interweb, and I mostly agree with it (although I do enjoy the Resident Evil series quite a bit). When plans of a Max Payne movie rolled around and they announced Wahlberg for the role I felt a smidge of optimism. When I saw Max Payne I felt a smidge of entertainment. Just a smidge.

What makes me angry about the “All video game movies suck” school of thought is that they don’t HAVE to suck. It is just time and time again terrible film-makers have kept this theme going. Max Payne doesn’t change that at all. It just doesn’t deliver on all levels. There are a few amazing visuals in this movie, but they are too far and in between.

The plot starts with Max Payne some years after his family’s murder. He is out for revenge. Connections are slowly but surely made between his family’s death and the death of a girl that he refused to fuck, and a drug on the streets.

This film had amazing visuals of hallucinations when people were on the drug. I think they could have used the drug and hallucinations a lot more and made the film more interesting. Instead we get Wahlberg, with his bad-ass face on, walking around intimidating people. They also used the slow-motion effect that was used in the game a couple times, but it just came off as distracting instead of contributing to the actual story.

Mark Wahlberg didn’t really do anything special with this character, but at the same time the writers didn’t give him a chance to flesh it out. I read an interview and he talked so highly about the film, but perhaps when he talks about it in retrospect he will think differently. I thought it was pretty cool to see Mila Kunis. I don’t think she has had a role like this before. She didn’t do a WHOLE lot but it was something different so I give her some credit.

Nothing about this film, except for a couple cool visuals that collectively equal about a minute, was memorable.

Despite all assumptions that video game movies suck, I gave this film a chance. It let me down. I was bored within 30 minutes of watching. Please do yourself a favor and don’t see this movie.

I give Max Payne a 3 out of 10.

Say “hi” to your mother for me okay?

My “W.” Review

October 19, 2008

As I drove to the theater to see “W.” I decided it was about damn time I come up with a solid opinion of the real George W. Bush. When I think of George W. Bush I think of words such as idiot, dumb, misunderestimated, and lots of other demeaning words. But those words are not mine. Those are words from the mouths of many pissed off Americans. My question has always been:

Who is this man, and how did he become the most hated president of my time?

Perhaps this film answered it, or it just opened up the answer that I already had in me.

Oliver Stone wanted me to feel bad for W. I did feel bad up to a certain point in his life, but when W. changed himself to prove something to his father I stopped believing in him. Oliver Stone didn’t make this film to make fun of W., but he made it to show us that he was no different than any of us at one point in our lives. Stone also showed us that there is a point in our lives where we can do things differently.

The events in W.’s life that were shown helped greatly in shaping my opinion. They will also add to those already established opinions if people are open to it. This film does something fantastic in taking the most hated man and turning him into a person, and it does so in a clean and honorable fashion. It has it’s laughs, but not always at the expense of our current president. And it has it’s slow parts that had me wondering at what point the film would start moving again.

Josh Brolin’s performance also lends a huge hand in the task of humanizing W. I was watching the man called W, and not Josh Brolin as W, which is all I can ask for from an actor. The same goes for the rest of the major cast. I was blown away by Thandie Newton as Condoleeza Rice. And I mean that in a bad way, that was more a bad impression than acting. I also favored the performance of Jeffrey Wright as Colin Powell. I had never actually heard Powell talk a lot, but Wright convinced me that Powell probably talks just like that. From the moment I heard Elizabeth Banks was going to be playing Laura Bush I was very surprised. And while watching her performance, I was surprised throughout that she was actually doing this film (I will love her so much more when I see her in “Porno”).

I congratulate Oliver Stone on his accomplishment. W. is one of the most unforgettable films I have seen.

Back to my question:

Who is this man, and how did he become the most hated president of my time?

This man’s path to becoming president was not the best path. He spent a life trying to prove himself worthy of the Bush name, something that he shouldn’t have had to do. He had dreams in his early life of being an athlete and that carried on throughout his life. But his father, constantly dragging him down, didn’t allow that dream to flourish. This situation is very classic to me:

A person has a dream, but people try to hold them back. The great people see through the oppressors and succeed. Some people are so brought down that they may not succeed in obtaining their dreams, but they can still carry inspiration and hope on to others. Then you have your “W.”’s, and they become a lesser version of what they could have been, or something else they never should have been. President.

I give “W.” a 7 out of 10.

Two Movies I Loved Full of Characters I Hated

October 13, 2008

Preface: Fuck, I have gone way too long without writing. I got scared honestly. But I’m getting back into it. Enjoy.

This past week I have watched two movies that have gotten the same reaction out of me: I really dislike the characters. The two movies:

Glengarry Glen Ross (plot summary from IMDB):

Times are tough in a New York real-estate office; the salesmen (Shelley Levene, Ricky Roma, Dave Moss, and George Aaronow) are given a strong incentive by Blake to succeed in a sales contest. The prizes? First prize is a Cadillac Eldorado, second prize is a set of steak knives, third prize is the sack! There is no room for losers in this dramatically masculine world; only “closers” will get the good sales leads. There is a lot of pressure to succeed, so a robbery is committed which has unforeseen consequences for all the characters.

and Confessions of a Superhero (plot summary from IMDB):

CONFESSIONS OF A SUPERHERO is a feature length documentary that chronicles the lives of three mortal men and one woman who make their living working as superhero characters on Hollywood Boulevard. This deeply personal look into their daily routines reveals their hardships and triumphs as they pursue and achieve their own kind of fame. The Hulk sold his Super Nintendo for a bus ticket to LA; Wonder Woman was a mid-western homecoming queen; Batman struggles with his anger, while Superman’s psyche is consumed by the Man of Steel. Although the Walk of Fame is right beneath their feet, their own paths to stardom prove to be long, hard climbs.

Both films feature dishonest characters. Glengarry Glen Ross showcases these salesmen who will lie and cheat to get their comissions and make it to the top. They just want their bloody money. Al Pacino’s character came off as rather honest at first. He was the top of the group of salesmen, or a “closer”, but then while trying to close a sale he shows just how good at lying he is. Maybe Kevin Spacey’s character was the most honest and likeable in this, as he was not a salesman, just the manager of sorts for the office. The other characters who were talking about how they were getting cheated and just complaining and complaining also pissed me off. They could talk so much about how they were being mistreated and that they would never get anywhere with the leads they were getting, but they wouldn’t actually DO anything about it. Until they did do something, and it wasn’t the right thing to do.

Confessions of a Superhero features real people who are really trying to make it in Hollywood by dressing up and taking pics with tourists. The problem is that some of them are scary when they mention the famous line “We work on tips”, and when a tourist doesn’t pay up the person dressed up gets pissed. Honestly, all I could think of was “get a real fucking job and spend your nights or mornings or any time off in auditions, or even acting school if you need it”. Some of these guys are just sitting there waiting for the big hand of success to come grab them, but it doesn’t work that way. The guy who is the Batman was probably the worst. He tells all these stories and confesses to a mass murder of Italian mobsters in the 80’s, but it’s hard to take him seriously.

Overall, these were FANTASTIC movies and just because I hated the characters/people does not mean that I hate the movie. I actually would love to see Glengarry Glen Ross again, that had some amazing performances from EVERYONE in it: Al Pacino, Ed Harris, Kevin Spacey, and some old guys.

Confessions of a Superhero was a great look at some very real people. Unfortunately for them, I do not sympathize one bit simply because they aren’t working hard enough towards their dream. If they were working hard enough, then they wouldn’t be in this documentary because they would be too busy.

I highly recommend these two films, and maybe you can hate the characters along with me.

My “Burn After Reading” Review

September 12, 2008

If you liked No Country For Old Men, well, it doesn’t matter because “Burn After Reading” is a DIFFERENT film altogether.

“What the fuck!?” is what the tagline should be for this movie. John Malkovich’s character uses it extensively, and the audiences across the nation have probably said it too while watching this.

The story starts off simple enough: a CIA analyst gets demoted but doesn’t take it too well, and quits instead. He decides to start writing some memoirs that include details about his secret work with the CIA. His wife, in an attempt to get his financial records on a disc, accidentally copies his memoirs along with them. Her lawyer’s secretary drops her copy in Hardbody’s Gym and it lands in the hands of the awesomely, flaky, bleached-blonde-haired Chad Feldheimer played every little bit by Brad Pitt. He believes he has his hands on some classified intelligence “shit”. He believes he can get money for it by blackmailing the owner, Osbourne Cox played by Malkovich, and Chad’s co-worker wants in on the action so she can pay for her cosmetic surgery(s).

A tangled fucking web starts to get weaved including unfaithful wives and husbands, and one confused as hell CIA superior played perfectly by J.K. Simmons (most would know him as J. Jonah Jameson, or Juno’s daddy).

I was super-pumped to go see this movie. One reason being the Coens, and the other being Brad Pitt. I say Brad Pitt because the dude is fucking amazing in everything I’ve seen him in since Fight Club, not because I’m gay (I’d fuck him).

Brad Pitt definitely lived up to my expectations and beyond, as always with him. We are so used to seeing him being the cool guy, but then you get him as this who works in a gym and just does NOT have a clue and it is brilliant.

John Malkovich was pure madness and pushed the anger and drinking problems to just the right level, not too over the top.

Frances McDormand’s character was just as dumb as Pitt’s, and they were an amazing team. Watching her character’s actions was a treat. The whole time you are thinking to yourself, “Is she really doing/saying that?”

Tilda Swinton played an awesome bitch. Yeah, she was a bitch and it was perfect.

Let’s not forget Mr. George Clooney. I don’t think I’ve ever seen him in a role like this. With the combination of Brad Pitt AND George Clooney playing someone other than their cool guy characters, it was amazing. It was refreshing to not recognize Clooney as Clooney, and instead as this guy with some serious issues.

What amazes me most about this movie is the writing. This is one of the best stories, writing-wise, that I’ve ever seen. This is some hardcore and reverse-engineered “shit”. I say reverse-engineered because there’s no way the Coens’ could write this in a linear fashion. They had to have started at the end and wrote this backwards to follow it themselves. I give them HUGE credit for this.

Best comedy/thriller/spy-crime/drama/noir/”What the fuck!?” film of the year.

Burn After Reading

8 out of 10

“The Incredible Hulk” Review

June 15, 2008

5 out of 5

The green beast is back, and better than ever. Edward Norton, one of my favorite actors of all time, has done a hugely fantastical magical greentastical job at bringing us back The Incredible Hulk in true Hulk form. Liv Tyler, one of my biggest Hollywood crushes, brings Betty Ross back in sexy nerdy girl fashion that makes Hulk excited.

Unlike most people I was a fan of the first Hulk movie, but was very open to the soon-after reboot announcement. Especially with Norton on board. Even though I liked the Ang Lee version, I totally understood why the reboot was necessary to please fans. After seeing this film I am not sure I will be able to sit through the first Hulk movie again.

One thing I hate about movies is when the opening credits go on for 5-10 minutes with some pointless music and fancy background. Most of the time it is necessary, but it is nice to see people get creative. My favorites in recent memory include the Spider-Man 2 opening: in which Spider-Man 1 is recapped through art stills, and the 007 Die Another Day opening: in which 007 is being tortured with a flaming lady dancing around on him. In The Incredible Hulk, the story of how Banner became the Hulk and then the events that immediately followed were shown in a matter of 5 minutes during the opening credits. Something that the Ang Lee Hulk took about a half hour to do.

The biggest issue surrounding the new Hulk was the appearance. I thought that in Lee’s original Hulk movie, maybe that was the best they can do. It seems like a tough effect to pull off. But then you watch the NEW film and the Hulk is so incredibly realistic, scary, monstrous, and yet keeps a very human touch to the face and the expressions. The technologies haven’t changed THAT much between this new Hulk film and the last one, and so the effects team is clearly superior in this film. From the moment I saw the Hulk’s face the first time, I had chills of excitement for the rest of the film whenever he appeared on screen (which was A LOT).

The next biggest issue was probably the amount of action that would be in the film. The trailers plenty reassured the fans that they would see action. I can’t say enough about it, there was THAT much. All the action was incredible and unique and kept you pumped for more. They didn’t overuse any Hulk moves or have him run and jump around for 12 minutes and call it action(I’m slowly starting to REALLY dislike the other film as I keep writing).

By far the BEST thing they did with this film was have an ENEMY. I’m not talking about the military, they use that in every film if someone needs an enemy. ABOMINATION! Okay I say it like I actually knew who that was before this film. I’ll come out and say that I have not read more than 10 comics in my life, but am in love with the genre. It’s kind of hypocritical and I give major props to the true nerds of the genre who made these movies possible. I am a MOVIE fan. Back on the subject: The Hulk had a true enemy to battle with. The major complaint of Superman Returns was that he had no enemy to fight, he just lifted shit(I still loved the film even if that is true). And the Ang Lee hulk sort of had an enemy, the Hulk just kinda jumped around clouds and then wrestled water. But Abomination was the MOST right thing they did with The Incredible Hulk.

Edward Norton is one of the best actors ever in my book, and this film says no different. He plays the part of Banner to freaking perfection, and I really don’t even know what perfection is, but Norton is all i can think of when I think perfection(and curb stomps). Liv Tyler was also awesome as Betty Ross. I always love her in everything she’s in, and she always is up for some great almost sex-scenes(Empire Records, Jersey Girl). I am not very familiar with William Hurt but he did an incredible acting job as General Ross, and way better than that guy from the last film with the way-to-perfect mustache. Tim Roth played a great character: Blonsky, who was just a great villain right before transforming into the TRUE villain: Abomination. I also loved Lou Ferrigno’s appearance as both the security guard and the voice of the Hulk. And of course Stan Lee’s cameo was enjoyable, my only tiff with the Lee cameos is that it takes you out of the magic for a second.

I am going to say it, I LOVED THE INCREDIBLE HULK MORE THAN IRON MAN. But it’s okay because Stark made an appearance to further set up the Avengers film that is slowly but surely approaching. I think it will be hard for ANY film the rest of the summer to top this one on the FUN level, not overall level, just the FUN level. This is an absolute MUST to go see, and you should NOT wait until DVD because you will only get half the fun if you don’t see it on the big screen. HULK…SMASH!!

“The Strangers” Review

June 15, 2008

3 out of 5

I don’t like most horror movies, but once in a while one interests me. The previews for The Strangers interested me a lot. I just thought the whole thing looked like a great way to show the same thing we’ve seen before in horror films. I went in hoping for something scary, and then was disappointed when that was exactly what I got.

The movie was pretty simple: a couple is in a house in a remote area of town and then get terrorized by three masked strangers. I have to say it had me scared through a lot of the film. On a scale of 1-10 of being scared, I would say most of the time it was a 5 to a 6, so moderately scary for me.

And umm….that’s pretty much it.

That’s what disappointed ME personally. I know a lot of people who are fans of the genre will love this movie because it does exactly what it should do: scare. But, for me, I like to get a little more out of my movies and that is why this genre is not for me. I usually like to write long reviews but I have nothing to say other than this movie moderately scared me, and it did great in that sense overall. But THAT’S IT.

If you just want to get the piss scared out of you than you will love this movie. But do not expect ANYTHING else at all. It is a purely scary flick that leaves scared and with your tail between your legs.

My “Indiana Jones and The Kingdom of the Crystal Skull” Review

May 23, 2008

2.5 out of 5

Surprisingly enough, for a huge movie fan, I was never an Indiana Jones fan. There was always something about ANY movie that had a story that largely involved archeology or ancient dusty settings that bored me. Indiana Jones was always all about that stuff. Before deciding to see the new Indy flick I decided to watch, for the first time in its entirety, The Raiders of the Lost Ark, and it turned out I enjoyed it quite a bit. I had already seen The Last Crusade in before, but not in a long time. I don’t think I ever saw Temple of Doom. As you are now aware, I am not the most credible Indiana Jones reviewer, but what should comfort you is that I am not entirely biased like most Indy maniacs. So, maybe my opinion of the new film won’t be so insignificant after all.

I gave this film a lot of credit going in mostly due to Steven Spielberg being the director. I can’t think of the last horrible Spielberg film I saw. The film starts with a few fast cars, and I was thrilled at that(I am a huge car and racing fan so they got me all happy at the start). It didn’t take them even ten minutes to get Indy on to the screen, which was good. However, when he got pulled out of the trunk of the car and they put the camera on his face my positive feelings sunk a bit. I automatically thought to myself, “Do they expect me to believe that this old guy can still do what he used to do?”. As the film went on, that thought was settled by great action sequences and no ridiculous stunt work to make it look like this old-ass Indy was actually doing back flips.

I thought Harrison Ford did a great job acting-wise, and we haven’t seen that from him in quite some time. I also didn’t mind the introduction of Shia LeBouf into the series, and I thought his character and story were pretty solid. He did some cool stunt work in this one too, and played the 50’s-greaser to its max. Cate Blanchett has always been great in everything she has done, and it wasn’t any different in this. But I don’t see her winning an Oscar or something to that caliber, she just was overall pretty solid.

My favorite thing about Indy 5 was that all the action was really good. Spielberg knows how to shoot this stuff well and there was nothing changing that here. Car chases in the jungle are always fun, and throwing in a sword fight was awesome. Again, I was mostly bored with all the ancient mumbo-jumbo and I KNOW that is the point of everything Indy, but it’s not for everyone so let’s cut me some slack.

My biggest problem was with the BULL-SHIT story line. I really can’t explain too much more about that until everyone has had ample time to see the flick. So I will post that reason later this week when everyone SHOULD have seen it by.

I can’t speak for Indiana Jones fans, but I did see it with an avid fan. Her opinion, as an Indy maniac, was that it was a pretty big let-down for her. Not the movie as a whole, but the entire backing story which, let’s face it, makes up most of a movie. I was also let down as I was rather excited after watching Raiders the day before. There were very few “Indy moments” like in all the other films: moments that define it as an INDIANA JONES FILM as opposed to just another action flick.

I think everyone should see it regardless. It is an enjoyable film, and it is also a historically important film in film history. I am not hoping for a new Indiana Jones film after this one. The things I feel they need to do to redeem themselves are things that an old and gray Indiana Jones can’t do. Just leave it be.

My “Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian” Review

May 18, 2008

Prince Caspian Poster

4.5 out of 5

I never got a chance to watch the first Narnia movie before watching the sequel. I saw it way back when it came out on DVD, but it wasn’t very fresh in my mind. Nevertheless, I enjoyed Prince Caspian a whole lot more than expected.

When Prince Caspian started out I was expecting to be lost without any memory of the first film, but that was not the case. The film was great on two levels: 1. as a sequel showing the older children and how they have grown with experience, also the different world of Narnia 2. as a stand-alone film about a long lost world trying to fight back for it’s existence against a harsh nation of man. This film had tons more action and fighting than the first one, that is one thing I noticed without a problem. I found that to be a fantastic change of pace for the franchise. The battles were all amazing and seeing the four kids jump back into action was incredible.

I was INCREDIBLY surprised to find out that this movie had a 2hr 20min running time. This movie flew by with excitement and I NEVER felt the effects of the time while watching. A couple complaints I have comeacross have been the lack of fantasy and wonder like in the first film, and the short time Aslan appears. I, personally, thought both of those facts about the film worked FOR the film. I think the lack of fantasy and wonder work for the part of the story about Narnia being gone and underground for hundreds of years. The lack of Aslan in the movie is also true, but again I think it HELPED the story. When he does show up it is at a great time and in a perfect way.

After the first Chronicles of Narnia came out there were a bunch of films trying to capitalize on the Narnia type fantasy-adventure. A couple were decent, but most just tried too hard and failed. What Prince Caspian did so right, and what the imitators failed at so badly, they kept it simple. Within the first 20 minutes of Caspian the plot for the rest of the movie had been laid out and it didn’t take any ridiculous or annoying twists. It made the film so much easier to be enjoyed without having to worry about following confusing plot points. If you enjoyed the first Narnia film than there is NO doubt you will enjoy this one. If you didn’t see the first Narnia film, you are missing out on the wonders of Narnia, but you will love this film regardless.